Are you using "Blood Gold"? Congress may have just helped us figure out.

Scott Cardiff's avatar
By Scott Cardiff

July 16, 2010

Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act yesterday with some important provisions for the effort to clean up mining. This includes provisions we pushed that should help allow consumers to know if their gold jewelry is tainted with human rights violations and atrocities in the Congo basin.

The bill requires mining, oil, and gas companies to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) what they are paying foreign governments. So mining companies might hesitate a little more before paying off officials for access to concessions or for deals that don't give many benefits for the public and the communities near a proposed mine.

The bill also requires companies reporting to the SEC and selling products with gold (or tin, tungsten, or tantalum) to do the following:

I'm thinking people don't want to buy jewelry that they know is "not DRC conflict free," i.e. "Blood Gold."

So companies now need to figure out if they get their gold from the Congo Basin, and this should help bring some needed transparency for the whole jewelry sector. Responsible operators already want to be able to report that they do not use "Blood Gold," and this legislation should give them an additional tool to do that.

The SEC has 270 days to get regulations on this up and going, and companies don't have to report until the financial year following that. For the sake of the people suffering from armed attacks and atrocities in the DRC, I certainly hope the SEC acts sooner rather than later.

Tagged with: transparency, no dirty gold, human rights, congo, conflict, coltan, blood gold

comments powered by Disqus

On Twitter

#NoBayouBridgePipeline protesters aim to build Standing Rock-like protest camp #NoDAPL #StopETP via @NOLAnews
ICYMI: Prayer and Resistance Camp Launches in #Louisiana to Challenge Pipeline Connected to DAPL… via @colorlines

On Facebook