EARTHWORKS

California Comes out of the Fracking Closet

Jennifer Krill's avatar
By Jennifer Krill

September 12, 2013

image

A tractor plows the fields in front of an oil rig in Kern County, CA

Senator Fran Pavley’s (D – Agoura Hills) bill to regulate fracking and acidizing for oil and gas passed the California Assembly by a vote of 47-17 yesterday. Earthworks had initially supported SB 4, but we withdrew our support after the bill was weakened at the last minute by the oil and gas industry and California’s surprisingly pro-drilling Governor Jerry Brown, just days before it came to a floor vote.

California is the nation’s 4th largest producer of oil, with over 50,000 wells. 80% of these wells are in Kern County around Bakersfield, uneasily sharing the landscape with the state’s productive agricultural industry and contributing to the worst air quality in the nation. Fracking has been happening for decades in California, but a new boom is on the horizon in oil production as oil companies like Chevron and Occidental gear up to use extreme extraction techniques to capture the oil trapped in the Monterey shale formation. Fracking isn’t the only thing we have to worry about in California; because of the states complicated earthquake-prone geology, parts of the Monterey shale are uneconomical to frack, but could be turned into oil fields using acidization and other unconventional extraction methods.

Despite its reputation as a bastion of environmentalism, California has been far behind other oil producing states and has had no regulation for fracking, acidization or other forms of unconventional oil and gas drilling. As recently as 2010, the state’s lead agency on oil and gas, known as DOGGR, claimed that fracking wasn’t occurring in California, even though oil producers claimed it had been happening for decades. DOGGR wasn’t issuing permits for fracking, wasn’t subjecting fracking to environmental laws or public review and wasn’t informing neighbors when fracking was coming to town.

This legislative session kicked off with the state Democratic party voting to add ‘banning fracking’ to its platform, and 10 different bills to reduce harm from fracking were introduced, including 3 bills which called for a moratorium on the practice while the state figured out whether there was any way to protect communities and the environment from fracking’s impacts. The ‘see no fracking, hear no fracking’ practice in the state was definitively challenged by state legislators.

The oil and gas companies fought back, hard. Tens of thousands of Californians have weighed in against fracking in California, and polls show a majority of Californians opposing fracking, but the movement to stop the California frack attack lost this play.

What’s problematic in the bill:

What we gain with the bill:

Over the past year, we watched SB 4 weaken – the original bill as written would have been a touch down for fracktivists - and by the end of the session we were still hoping for a first down. Now that the bill has passed, we may not have even gained yardage – especially if the bill harms our ability to apply CEQA to oil and gas fracking and acidizing in the state. Attention now turns to Governor Jerry Brown’s administration; whether or not he signs the bill into law, he is in charge of the agency that is supposed to be protecting Californians from renegade oil and gas companies. And also, attention turns to local governments, who are taking action across the state to ban or reduce harm from fracking.

Tagged with: sb4, fran pavley, fracking, doggr, ceqa, california, acidizing

comments powered by Disqus

On Twitter

.@EPA Testing Methods To Detect #Fracking Water Contamination | @spogburn in @KUCN bit.ly/1phYw24
RT @insideclimate: Are you going to the @peoplesclimate march in Sept??? If yes, @jackcushmanjr wants to hear why...ping him.

On Facebook