|
![]() |
![]() |
Mining ReformCampaignsAffiliatesPartners |
Current Law Not EnoughA 21st Century Anachronism Mining companies do have to comply with the existing federal laws, most prominently the:
Shortcomings
While some states do have laws governing hardrock mining, they do not fill the void left by the shortcomings of current federal laws. The fact that widespread mining pollution persists and mining companies can still avoid all or most of their cleanup and reclamation responsibilities, confirms the weakness, narrowness, and inadequate enforcement of these state laws. Moving Forward |
Community VoicesCuster National Forest, MT"Rancher Not Informed about Mineral Leasing" is Jeanie Alderson's story about what it means when the federal government owns the minerals below private land - mainly, that surface owners have little or no input into the leasing process or decisions that will greatly affect their lives and livelihoods. NewsUnchanged (for the Worse) Since 1872A New York Times editorial making the case for reforming the 1872 Mining Law. PublicationsModern Mining Law Fact Sheet1872 Mining Law Factoid #2The 1872 Mining Law: Hardrock Mining and Reclamation Act of 2007The 1872 Mining Law: Paying the PriceThe 1872 Mining Law: Public Lands at RiskHardrock Mining and Reclamation Act of 2007EARTHWORKS Cosponsorship Letter to Congress Hardrock Mining and Reclamation Act of 2007Comparison of Predicted and Actual Water Quality at Hardrock MinesThe reliability of predictions in Environmental Impact Statements |